Record Details

The shear bond strength of an immediate and delay repaired light-cure composite restoration (In vitro study).

Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title The shear bond strength of an immediate and delay repaired light-cure composite restoration (In vitro study).
 
Creator AL-Hashimi, Angham G.
Al-Azzawi, Abdulkarim J
Al-Azzawi, Haitham J
 
Description Background: Defects in composite resin restoration whether discovered at the time of placement or associated with
old composite resin restoration could be repaired without replacing the entire restoration. This in vitro study was
conducted to determine and compare the shear bond strength of an immediate and delay repaired light cured
composite restoration.
Materials and methods: Eighty acrylic blocks (25x25x15 mm) were constructed from cold cure acrylic resin; each one
contained an acrylic hole (6mm diameter and 3mm depth) that filled with Helioprogress composite resin. The surface
layer of the composite resin samples was light cured through plastic strip, abraded by finishing discs and rinsed with
deionized distilled water for 15 sec. The eighty specimens were divided randomly into two groups according to the
storage time in deionized distilled water before the repair:
Group I: Stored for 15 min. (Immediate repair group)
Group II: Stored for 1week. (Delay repair group)
Both groups were subdivided into 4 subgroups according to the surface treatment they received:
Subgroup 1: No surface treatment (control)
Subgroup 2: 37% phosphoric acid etchant (15 sec.)
Subgroup 3: Heliobond (light activated for 20 sec.)
Subgroup 4: 37% phosphoric acid and Heliobond.
Repair was done by using a standardized translucent plastic straw (3mm diameter and 6mm length) and was filled
Helioprogress composite resin and light cured for 40 sec. in four directions. All the specimens were stored in deionized
distilled water for 24 hr. testing was done by the Zwick testing machine by applying shearing force with specially
designed chisel-shape rod. Data obtained were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance test and t-test.
Results: The results showed very highly significant difference between the similar subgroups in group I vs. group II and
there was non-significant difference between subgroup 1 vs. 2 and between subgroup 3 vs. 4.
Conclusion: Delaying the repair procedure for 1 w resulted markedly reduced the bond strength, the surface
treatment with 37% phosphoric acid slightly reduced the bond strength in the immediate repair while slightly
increased it in the delay repair, Furthermore, the surface treatment with Heliobond fifth generation bonding agent
markedly increased the bond strength in both repairs.
 
Publisher College of dentistry/ University of baghdad
 
Date 2017-01-30
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
 
Identifier http://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/1556
 
Source Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry; Vol 23 No Special Is (2011); 5-9
2311-5270
1680-0087
 
Language en
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry